by Debra Dupree
Presented by: Blain Donais, LL.B, LL.M
What is workplace fairness? What does conflict cost?
And, why do we care?
Author and ACR Conference Presenter Blaine Donais started asking
those questions nearly 15 years ago in the course of his labor law
practice as he explored due process systems for non-union employees.
What he found was a lack of research or literature to match his real
life experience in both union and non-union dispute issues.
Recognizing that conflict “costs” organizations in visible and
invisible ways, he embarked on a course to develop a survey to
measure costs and evaluate existing conflict management systems.
This resulted in his recent publication Workplaces That Work: A
Guide to Conflict Management in Union and Non-Union Work
Environments, filled with instruments that provide quantitative
solutions to managing workplace conflict (available through
www.canadalawbook.ca).
Let’s go back to the initial question of “What is workplace
fairness?” Blaine defines workplace fairness as the following:
“all participants should be treated with equality of concern and
respect in the management of workplace conflict.” Why does this
matter to organizations? As repeatedly demonstrated in the examples
presented, the lack of concern and respect in the workplace can have
devastating effects on employee satisfaction and productivity,
ultimately costing organizations plenty. Workplace fairness is
considered the key to motivate productivity and loyalty, both of
which substantially deter from the bottom line.
So how do we measure it? Blaine’s instrument helps achieve three
key factors:
1) A tool to analyze workplaces to define and assess current
conflict management systems (CMS) and how to achieve sustainable
improvements.
2) A model applicable in ANY workplace and translatable to almost
any culture and/or country.
3) How even unionized environments can have effective CMS provided
that the union facilitates buy-in and inclusion of its working
members.
The Workplace Fairness Checklist (WFC) examines what and how an
organization embodies the following options:
1) Interest-based
2) Rights-Based
3) Communications-Based
4) Power-Based
The checklist uses four key quotients to further assess the
effectiveness of an existing CMS: Justice, Efficiency, Engagement,
and Resources. The checklist is akin to an accountant measuring the
financial health of an organization. However, in this case, the
health of an organization is assessed using the “Testing Instrument
for Fairness Systems” (TIFFS) to diagnose and modify an existing
(but perhaps unknown) fairness system. To get at the bottom-line
costs, the Fairness Cost analysis tool (FCAT) helps organizations
reach decisions on how to improve the company’s bottom line.
Blaine has designed his series of checklists and instruments in a
way that actively engages stakeholders in a way that positively
impacts trust between employees and organizational leaders. For more
information on “Workplace Fairness” and the assessment devices to
measure it, contact Blaine Donais at (416)
531-9384 or
donais@workplacefairness.ca.
© Workplace Section News, Fall 2007