Conflict Resolution Quarterly

An Introduction to Conflict Resolution Quarterly

Conflict Resolution Quarterly publishes scholarship on relationships between theory, research, and practice in the conflict management and dispute resolution field to promote more effective professional applications. Conflict Resolution Quarterly is sponsored by the Association for Conflict Resolution.

As the fields of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and Conflict Resolution experience exponential growth, Conflict Resolution Quarterly has become an indispensible tool for practitioners, scholars and students.  That’s why it is the most widely distributed journal covering the role of the neutral in processes such as mediation, arbitration, negotiation, facilitation and other conflict resolution processes at the local, national and international levels.

Articles may focus on any aspect of the conflict resolution process or context, but a primary focus is the behavior, role and impact of third parties in effectively handling conflict at all levels from the interpersonal to the international. All theoretical and methodological orientations are welcome. Submission of scholarship with the following emphases is encouraged:

• Discussion of a variety of third party conflict resolution practices including dialogue, facilitation, facilitated negotiation, mediation, fact-finding, and arbitration.

• Analyses of disputant and third party behavior, preference, and reaction to conflict situations and conflict management processes.

• Consideration of conflict processes in a variety of conflict contexts including family, organizational, community, court, health care, commercial, international, and educational contexts.

• Sensitivity to relational, social, and cultural contexts that define and impact conflict.

• Interdisciplinary analyses of conflict resolution and scholarship providing insights applicable across conflict resolution contexts.

• Discussion of conflict resolution training and education processes, program development, and program evaluation and impact for programs focusing on the development of more competent conflict resolution in educational, organizational, community, or professional contexts.

• The state of the evolving fields of Conflict Resolution and Alternative Dispute Resolution.

A defining focus of the journal is the relationship between theory, research and practice. All articles should specifically address the implications of theory for practice and research directions, how research can better inform practice, or how research can contribute to theory development with important implications for practice.

Conflict Resolution Quarterly publishes conventional the following types of manuscripts:

• Scholarly articles: These manuscripts should be approximately 30 double-spaced pages (7,500 words) and share new information related to the theory and practice of Conflict Resolution (CR) , Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), or related fields. These articles must contain a review of the current state of knowledge on the research question(s) of interest, then share new information based on qualitative or quantitative research or new ideas that will impact the state of theory and/or practice in these areas.
• Practice notes: These are shorter manuscripts of up to 3,500 words that are of specific interest to practitioners. These manuscripts must present new techniques, ideas, or methods for the practice, administration, or design of conflict resolution programs, trainings or initiatives.  
• Research notes: Similar to practice notes, these are shorter manuscripts of up to 3,500 words that have specific implications for the development of conflict resolution theories.
• Letters to the Editor, Commentary or Reactions: The purpose of these articles is to discuss the state of the quickly evolving fields of Conflict Resolution and Alternative Dispute Resolution; to share reactions or thoughts concerning previous publications; or to discuss hot topics that impact the theory or practice of CR and ADR. These can be of any length and are published at the discretion of the Editor and Editorial Board.

Submissions are only accepted in electronic form via this website:

http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/crq.

Manuscript Review Process, Timelines and Acceptance Rates

To ensure fairness to all authors and to maintain high standards of quality and utility in its publication, CRQ uses a double-blind peer review process. This means that all manuscripts are reviewed by at least two peer reviewers. The reviewers do not know the names or identities of the authors during this process, nor do the authors know the identity of the reviewers. Reviewers may be Editorial Board members or they may be invited Guest Reviewers.  Getting published in CRQ is dependent solely upon the manuscript’s quality and the utility for journal’s readers. In order to ensure that manuscripts are reviewed by readers with appropriate expertise, the Editorial Board of CRQ is broadly diverse in all ways: demographically, geographically, methodologically, and with all areas of subfield expertise represented (e.g. family mediation, restorative justice, international conflict resolution, negotiation, arbitration, etc). 

Most submissions receive an initial editorial decision within 8 weeks from the date of the submission. If the Editor requests changes to the manuscript before a final decision can be made, authors are asked to make those changes within six months. The second-round of review is generally much quicker, with an average of four weeks needed to make a final decision.

The acceptance rate for CRQ varies depending upon the number of submissions in any given year. If you would like to receive information about the journal’s acceptance rate, please email the Editor at sraines@kennesaw.edu

When a manuscript is accepted for publication, authors are asked to sign a letter of agreement granting the publisher the right to copyedit, publish, and copyright the material. Manuscripts under review for possible publication in Conflict Resolution Quarterly must be new and previously unpublished. They may not be submitted for review elsewhere concurrent to their submission to CRQ.

Editorial Board Service

Members of the CRQ Editorial Board are invited to serve a one year term, which may be renewed at the mutual agreement of the Editor and Board member. Service on the Editorial Board of CRQ is a time consuming volunteer activity that includes no financial compensation. Members of the Editorial Board must be recognized as experts in their particular fields, either as practitioners, academics or both. The Editor strives to achieve balance and diversity on the Board in every way, including but not limited to: application areas in the fields of ADR and Conflict Resolution; methodologies for research; academic and practitioner orientations; gender; race; national origin; and sexual orientation. 

Manuscript Preparation Guidelines

All submissions should be prepared according to the Chicago Style Manual (15th ed., University of Chicago Press). Double-space everything in the manuscript, including quotes and reference sections. Indent the first line of paragraphs and leave no extra space between paragraphs. Margins should be at least one-inch wide, and there should be no more than 250 words per manuscript page. Use 8-1/2” x 11” nonerasable bond paper and type or print out on one side only. The printed copy from word processors must be in regular typewriter face, not dot matrix type.

Text writing should be directed to a multidisciplinary audience and be as readable and practical as possible. Illustrate theoretical ideas with specific examples, explain technical terms in nontechnical language, and keep the style clear. Do not include graphs or statistical tables unless necessary for clarity. Spell out such abbreviations as e.g., etc., i.e., et al., and vs. in their English equivalents—in other words, use for example, and so on, that is, and others, and versus (except in legal cases, where “v.” is used).

All submissions must be made electronically via our submissions platform at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/crq  Hardcopy or email submissions are not allowed. Be sure to leave all identifying information off of the manuscript that is uploaded to this website, so as to facilitate the double-blind peer review process. If you experience technical difficulties please call ScholarOne at 434-964-4100 for assistance.

Citations and References

Cite all sources of quotations or attributed ideas in the text, including the original page number of each direct quotation and statistic, according to the following examples:

Night (1983) argues cogently that references are a pain in the neck.

As one authority states, “References are a pain in the neck” (Knight, 1983, p. 35).

Do not use footnotes or endnotes. Incorporate all footnote material into the text proper, perhaps within parentheses.

Follow these examples for typing references:

Single-author book or pamphlet
Hunter, J. E. Meta-Analysis: Cumulating research Findings Across Studies. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, 1982.

Multiple-author book or pamphlet
Hammond, D. C., Hepworth, D. H., and Smith, V. G. Improving Therapeutic Communication: A Guide for Developing Effective Techniques. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1977.

Edited Book/Multiple edition
Brakel, S. J., and Rock, R. S. (eds.). The Mentally Disabled and the Law. (2nd ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971.

Chapter in an edited book
Patterson, G. R. “Beyond Technology: The Next Stage in the Development of Parent Training.” In L. L’Abate (ed.), Handbook of Family Psychology and Therapy. Vol. 2. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press, 1985.

Journal or magazine article
Aussieker, B., and Garabino, J. W. “Measuring Faculty Unionism: Quantity and Quality.” Industrial Relations, 1973, 12 (1), 117-124.

Paper read at a meeting
Sherman, L. W., Gartin, P. R., Doi, D., and Miler, S. “The Effects of Jail Time on Drunk Drivers.” Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, November 6, 1986.

Unpublished report
Keim, S. T., and Carney, M. K. A Cost-Benefit Study of Selected Clinical Education Programs for Professional and Allied Health Personnel. Arlington: Bureau of Business and Economic Research, University of Texas, 1975.

Government report
Florida Advisory Council on Intergovernmental Relations. Impact Fees in Florida. Tallahassee: Florida Advisory Council on Intergovernmental Relations, 1986.

Unpublished dissertation
Johnson, W. P. “A Study of the Acceptance of Management Performance Evaluation Recommendations by Federal Agencies: Lessons from GAO Reports Issued in FY 1983.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Business Administration, George Mason University, Washington, D.C. 1986.

Figures, Tables, and Exhibits
Clean copies of figures should accompany the manuscript. Upon an article’s acceptance, authors must provide camera-ready artwork. Tables, figures, and exhibits should be double-spaced on separate pages.

Submissions are only accepted in electronic form via this website:

http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/crq.

Questions regarding editorial matters should be sent to Susan S. Raines, Ph.D., Editor-in-Chief, CRQ, sraines@kennesaw.edu or via the mail Kennesaw State University, mail drop #2205, 1000 Chastain Road NW, Kennesaw, GA 30144-5591.  

ACR Members: Don't forget that you have complete access to CRQ through Wiley's Interscience portal. Log in to to the ACR Member Center for more information. Click here.

Click here for information on advertising in CRQ.