Contact: Sharon Pickett, phone: 301-365-9307,
e-mail: sharonp@igc.org
Conference
in Tucson Reviews 30 years of Environmental Mediation
What Have We Learned? Who Benefits?
Are Negotiated Settlements Good for the Environment?
May 16-18, 2002 – Tucson, AZ
The conflict resolution profession is rapidly
expanding, and nowhere is this trend more prevalent
than in the area of environmental dispute resolution.
Mediators, arbitrators, and other conflict resolution
professionals are increasingly in demand to help
resolve tough environmental struggles involving
multiple stakeholders. The skills that they bring
to their jobs have an enormous impact on both
communities and the ecosystem.
From May 16-18, environmental mediators from
across the country will gather at the Ventana
Canyon Resort in Tucson to share lessons learned
and discuss ways to improve and expand the use
of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). Participants
are members of the Environment and Public Policy
Section of the Association for Conflict Resolution,
a nonprofit organization representing more than
6000 conflict resolution professionals. The ACR
conference will immediately follow a conference
by the U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict
Resolution (USIECR) in the same location. Media
are invited to attend. Interviews are available
on request.
Topics for Discussion:
-
What are the key lessons learned since the
landmark 1972 Snoqualmie mediation?
-
Who should monitor the field of environmental
and public policy conflict resolution? Who
will determine best practices? Under what
authority? With what (if any) sanctions?
-
Have agreements produced through mediation
been implemented? Are they working?
-
What do various stakeholders (agencies, environmental
advocates, community members, etc.) see as
the pros and cons of negotiated settlements?
-
People from different cultures often hold
very different values and views about their
relationship to the environment. Are there
strategies that can help different groups
find common ground?
-
What factors should be considered when deciding
whether or not to mediate an environmental
dispute? How does the process of mediation
affect decision-making? What is the role of
the mediator?
-
Collaborative processes are now used by many
federal programs including the EPA, Bureau
of Land Management, US Forest Service and
others. What types of disputes fall under
these agencies? What are the unique challenges
facing the mediator and disputants in such
agencies?
Available for Interviews:
Rosemary Romero is a mediator
in Santa Fe, New Mexico, and a board member of
the Association for Conflict Resolution. She has
extensive experience in environmental mediation
including negotiating forest management, land
use, water planning and watershed management issues
for various agencies.
Other speakers (US Forest Service ranger, environmental
activist, community leader.) are also available
to discuss their experience with environmental
mediation.
05/16/2002
|